Greetings, dear Corruptafans.
As you may have noticed, there have not been any significant entries to this particular page for some time. Rest assured, we are still alive and well, and have not (at least to this point) been hauled off by Government agents.
We are working diligently on the new album, and have thus far completed recording everything. We are done with the initial edit and mix for one song, Chemicals, and are now starting to get up into the guts of "Koach Perse". So, yeah. Stay tuned.
CorruptaBlog
Friday, July 29, 2011
Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Ron Paul Has Officially Announced...that He's Thinking About Running For President.
While it's not official yet, Ron Paul has announced the formation of a committee towards the inquiry at a shot at the presidency. Or something like that. I think it's the bureaucratic method for announcing you're going to run for president. Forming a committee is the official way of unofficially announcing a run. So...you know...effing sweet. That means that if you don't know who Ron Paul is, you should do a little homework. Watch some youtube videos, read something...just make your own decision.
Thanks for playing.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20057611-503544.html
http://www.prisonplanet.com/ron-paul-why-i-want-to-be-president.html
Thanks for playing.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20057611-503544.html
http://www.prisonplanet.com/ron-paul-why-i-want-to-be-president.html
Saturday, April 16, 2011
The US Military-Industrial-Complex, Globalist Banking, and YOU (or, Why We Really Blow Shit Up)
This is a combination of 2 notes I originally wrote on Facebook that I thought needed to be combined, updated, and prettified as only a blog can. Enjoy.
To start...
There is a group of people in existence that I will simply refer to as "The Globalists", or "The Global Elite". I am no expert on them, hell, I've only touched the tip of the iceberg when it comes to learning about who comprises this group or where their massive power comes from.
But what I do know is this. The World Bank, IMF, International Crisis Group, and lots, and lots, and LOTS of organizations exist that are basically all the same thing. That is, they're funded by the same pool of ultra-rich people, and their main goal is a one-world-government and an internationally-accepted banking system...through the devaluation of the dollar.
The rationale behind this is simple. Those with power and money want one thing...more power and money.
You with me so far? Well...hang on, because we're going to take a ride through some crazy-ass shit.
First, off, China has now openly accused the US Government and Western forces of working to topple the Chinese Government. It's not speculation. I didn't read this in somebody's blog. It's out there in the ether for all to find.
For example, this Reuters article states:
"Chinese leaders believe domestic foes, their foreign backers and Western governments are scheming to undermine and ultimately topple the Communist Party. Recent speeches and articles from security officials echo with warnings of subversive plots backed by Western "anti-China" forces."
Essentially, Libya, Tunisia, Egypt, The Ivory Coast, Iraq, Afghanistan, China and even JAPAN are all a part of the same plan to destabilize those who could cause problems for the Globalist-backed, US-lead, UN 'coalition of the coerced'.
Sound crazy? I know. But it's fucking true. Let's take a ride...
Egypt - Okay. There are riots in Egypt because the people are poor. This is 100% true. However, what nobody tells you is that the current poverty in Egypt is largely due to the the fact that in the 1990's, Egypt attempted to privatize a large majority of it's assets with the help of the World Bank, IMF, etc. Basically, they sold off a shitload State-owned assets, resources, etc. to the highest bidder. This was an attempt to "stabilize" a "declining" Egyptian government, and lauded by the International Banking community for their great financial reform.
Sound familiar? It will. Remember this pattern: 1. Country's government in trouble. 2. Power-shift occurs 3. IMF/World Bank & Co. come in, privatize, the locals get poor(er).
Well, the fun part is, in may of 2010, the New York Times reported that the Egyptian government announced that the sale of state assets to individual investors had effectively ended. What this means is that Egypt (Mubarack) said they(he) were(was) no longer going to play ball with the global banking cartel.
Now, less than a year later, Hosni Mubarack, longtime friend to the US and globalist puppet, has been deposed and the Egyptian government "mysteriously" hangs in the balance.
But who is set to be the next "interim president"? A fellow named Mohammed El Baradei. To the layperson, Baraedei looks like a good guy. He's an activist for change in Egypt. He won the Nobel Prize (Yeah, and so did Obama). He's head of the International Atomic Energy Agency. But, what is most interesting is that right up until the time where he decided to stick his nose into Egyptian politics, he sat on the board of trustees for a globalist-funded organization called "The International Crisis Group".
In essence, the ICG is created and funded by the same Global Elite I've been lamenting. It was founded in part by a World Bank VP, and is funded by the Carnegie, the Ford Foundation, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, as well as George Soros’ Open Society Institute. (In other words, the super-rich)
Not only that, but George Soros sits on the board of trustees for the ICG. Now, if I were to start on how big this guy is, it would take me a week. Let's just say that he's the fucking devil incarnate, he's got more money than God, and he has publicly endorsed using political and military force in order to "stabilize" the resources of a country. Like Iraq. And Egypt. An example of how evil this SOB is...basically, he literally broke the bank of England on a whim.
So, the guy now vetting for the Presidency of Egypt has direct ties to the IMF, World Bank, and George Soros.
On top of their national resources, Egypt also happens to be conveniently located right between Libya and Israel. And Israel wants to expand. Oh, and it's got a shitload of border on the Mediterranean, making it a valuable asset in other Middle-eastern affairs. Not to mention 1.1B annual industry in offshore outsourcing by companies like Microsoft (ICG is funded by Bill Gates foundation), Google, and HP...it would definitely benefit us to have friends in Egypt.
Iraq - Aaaaah...Iraq, the country we conveniently had plans to invade FOUR DAYS after 9/11. Funny how there has NEVER BEEN ANY EVIDENCE of ANY link to Al-Quaeda.
Not only that, but their claim that the Saddam had WMD's and mobile laboratories was based on a SINGLE VERBAL ACOUNT from an Iraqi Expatriate who himself said he was "utterly astonished" that the US believed him. Conveniently enough, Iraq also has a SHITLOAD OF OIL (about 10% of the World's proven reserves) that the US is now completely in control of, and protects with military bases and a .44 square kilometer "Embassy Complex" that is larger than Vatican City.
Oh, and did I mention that the original invasion of Kuwait took place by Saddam Hussein with the blessing of the US Ambassador to Iraq at the time? Or howabout the fact that in 1998, a one George Soros effected the drafting of an Open Letter to the Clinton Administration demanding military force to cause regime change in Iraq?
Ivory Coast - Ivory Coast is important because they have COCOA. As weird as it sounds, a large majority of the world's Cocoa comes from IC. As I've been saying, the pattern here is to swoop in with the IMF, privatize a countries resources, and make the folks suffer.
So, with all this other shit is going on, France and the UN decided to go into the former French Colony and depose it's RECOGNIZED ELECTED official. Why? Because the guy that has direct ties to the IMF and World Bank, the one "they" wanted in power there, was ruled invalid to be president of IC because he was not a natural citizen. This decision came from a non-corrupt Supreme Court in that country. However, the UN decided that wasn't cool, so they forcibly removed the rightful President.
Libya - Libya is easy. We've wanted Khaddafi out of power since the Regan administration (Back when dude was actually dangerous). It should be pointed out that many of the "rebels" in Libya are actually Al-Quaeda, and that there is a lot of hard evidence that shows that the US government trains and funds Al-Quaeda time and time again.
So, why now? Because...in 2009, Gaddafi announced that he was going to nationalize Libya's oil...and that of all Oil in the region. Not only that, he wanted to DISMANTLE THE GOVERNMENT, remove himself from power, and redistribute the wealth directly to the 5 million citizens of Libya.
This would be VERY bad for the people at Anglo-Dutch SHELL, BP, EXXONMOBIL, Hess Corp., MARATHON OIL, Occidental, ConocoPHILLIPS...etc. Why? Because...they no longer get to make all the money on Libyan oil...it all goes to the people.
On top of that, Libya's Central Bank is independant from the BIS...which means they have more bargaining power because they control their own central bank. It's complex, but it's a bad thing if you want to have global control over shit. Instead of the IMF being able to offer high-interest loans to Libyan citizens and entrap them in a cycle of perpetual debt, they would be free to offer interest-free loans to Libyan citizens.
So, what do you do? Funnel money into political parties and trained killers, have them get the locals all worked up, then go attack the president who is trying to defend himself. And look what happens! The rebels establish a national bank and set up new agreements to distribute oil. Surprised yet?
Afghanistan - Believe it or not...we are not in Afghanistan on a search for Osama Bin Laden. We are not there because the Taliban is our enemy, as some stupid country singer so proposed. Fuck...we put the Taliban in power in the first place.
Once again...we are in Afghanistan because of...OIL!
According to this well-researched article, we've wanted to install a "Western-friendly" government in Afghanistan since 1998...three years before 9/11. Numerous government documents outline the NEED for an OIL PIPELINE to be constructed through Afghanistan, and the challenges issued by the current seated government.
Then you have a lovely timeline showing that we were attacking them YEARS before 9/11, and that we had troops in place before we were ever "Attacked".
The pipeline itself? It would provide a link to Azerbaijan, which is oil-rich and US-friendly, across the Caspian Sea, through Turkey, through Afghanistan, through Pakistan, and finally to ships to be distributed around the world (To US). The only country in the region not on board was AFGHANISTAN. Furthermore, this explains why, despite the fact that we know the Pakistani government is funding Al-Qaeda and is most likely where Osama Bin Laden really is, we have not gone into Pakistan to get him. They're our "ally".
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/oil.html
All-CIA, DUH! - In the 1980's, the US helped to train and fund a band of Mujadeen fighters who called themselves Al-Qaeda. One of the leaders was a guy named Osama Bin Laden, and the program was called Operation Cyclone.
It has furthermore been asserted that the CIA continued to fund Bin Laden after the original events in Afghanistan.
Lastly, the man who reportedly #1 on the CIA's capture/kill list (issued by Bush J.), Al-Qaeda Leader Anwar Al-Awlaki, was having lunch at the Pentagon with top Military Officials months after 9/11.
And that's just skimming the surface. Then you look at the current friendly involvement with the same group in Libya, and it doesn't sound so damned crazy.
Basically...the US Military is not some great vehicle for freedom like people so obviously believe. Our soldiers are not fighting for our freedom, and 9/11 was not perpetrated by some dark-skinned assholes because they hates US freedom. It was orchestrated by our government and a group of super-rich elite as an effort to sell a war that had nothing to do with "freedom" and everything to do with stealing other countries resources for our own economic benefit.
Japan & HAARP - This next bit is mere speculation. I'm going to offer up a bunch of documented information, then explain a very logical motive, then leave it for you to decide. I don't fully believe this, but it wouldn't surprise me if it turned out to be true.
So, HAARP stands for High Auroral Activity Research Project. It is a government-owned facility in Alaska...
If you really want to know about HAARP, read the following link. It summarizes the book "Angels Don't Play this HAARP", which is another well-researched book on the whole shebang, and what it can do.http://haarp.net/
So, if you're still with me and you even skimmed that article, you maybe understand how it is possible to, say, cause an earthquake in Japan.
As to the motives...again, it's fairly simple. Destabilization. Japan is the third-largest economy in the world, behind the US and China. Not only that, but given Japan's strategic location in regards to China and North Korea, I would think that Japan would be a PERFECT place to want a reason to set up bases and distribute "humanitarian aid".
As I pointed out in the beginning of this writing, many people believe that the US is trying to cause similar destabilization in China. Considering as how we are in a deep economic recession and that China is quickly becoming poised to be the new world Superpower, it would seem logical that if you're the spoiled kid on the way out, you're going to do everything possible in order to keep your position in first. That "everything" would include destabilizing and controlling areas that are key to our Economic superiority (through oil and other natural resources).
In closing...I don't claim that 100% of this is right-on-the-money. I am just pointing out what I've seen as being pretty odd, and explaining that I feel that it seems like a lot more than just coincidence that all these countries with stuff we want are being destabilized at the same time. It seems like a desperate power-play, or maybe the first steps in trying to force the world into a one-world-government. Whatever the case...it's fucking scary...
To start...
There is a group of people in existence that I will simply refer to as "The Globalists", or "The Global Elite". I am no expert on them, hell, I've only touched the tip of the iceberg when it comes to learning about who comprises this group or where their massive power comes from.
But what I do know is this. The World Bank, IMF, International Crisis Group, and lots, and lots, and LOTS of organizations exist that are basically all the same thing. That is, they're funded by the same pool of ultra-rich people, and their main goal is a one-world-government and an internationally-accepted banking system...through the devaluation of the dollar.
The rationale behind this is simple. Those with power and money want one thing...more power and money.
You with me so far? Well...hang on, because we're going to take a ride through some crazy-ass shit.
First, off, China has now openly accused the US Government and Western forces of working to topple the Chinese Government. It's not speculation. I didn't read this in somebody's blog. It's out there in the ether for all to find.
For example, this Reuters article states:
"Chinese leaders believe domestic foes, their foreign backers and Western governments are scheming to undermine and ultimately topple the Communist Party. Recent speeches and articles from security officials echo with warnings of subversive plots backed by Western "anti-China" forces."
Essentially, Libya, Tunisia, Egypt, The Ivory Coast, Iraq, Afghanistan, China and even JAPAN are all a part of the same plan to destabilize those who could cause problems for the Globalist-backed, US-lead, UN 'coalition of the coerced'.
Sound crazy? I know. But it's fucking true. Let's take a ride...
Egypt - Okay. There are riots in Egypt because the people are poor. This is 100% true. However, what nobody tells you is that the current poverty in Egypt is largely due to the the fact that in the 1990's, Egypt attempted to privatize a large majority of it's assets with the help of the World Bank, IMF, etc. Basically, they sold off a shitload State-owned assets, resources, etc. to the highest bidder. This was an attempt to "stabilize" a "declining" Egyptian government, and lauded by the International Banking community for their great financial reform.
Sound familiar? It will. Remember this pattern: 1. Country's government in trouble. 2. Power-shift occurs 3. IMF/World Bank & Co. come in, privatize, the locals get poor(er).
Well, the fun part is, in may of 2010, the New York Times reported that the Egyptian government announced that the sale of state assets to individual investors had effectively ended. What this means is that Egypt (Mubarack) said they(he) were(was) no longer going to play ball with the global banking cartel.
Now, less than a year later, Hosni Mubarack, longtime friend to the US and globalist puppet, has been deposed and the Egyptian government "mysteriously" hangs in the balance.
But who is set to be the next "interim president"? A fellow named Mohammed El Baradei. To the layperson, Baraedei looks like a good guy. He's an activist for change in Egypt. He won the Nobel Prize (Yeah, and so did Obama). He's head of the International Atomic Energy Agency. But, what is most interesting is that right up until the time where he decided to stick his nose into Egyptian politics, he sat on the board of trustees for a globalist-funded organization called "The International Crisis Group".
In essence, the ICG is created and funded by the same Global Elite I've been lamenting. It was founded in part by a World Bank VP, and is funded by the Carnegie, the Ford Foundation, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, as well as George Soros’ Open Society Institute. (In other words, the super-rich)
Not only that, but George Soros sits on the board of trustees for the ICG. Now, if I were to start on how big this guy is, it would take me a week. Let's just say that he's the fucking devil incarnate, he's got more money than God, and he has publicly endorsed using political and military force in order to "stabilize" the resources of a country. Like Iraq. And Egypt. An example of how evil this SOB is...basically, he literally broke the bank of England on a whim.
So, the guy now vetting for the Presidency of Egypt has direct ties to the IMF, World Bank, and George Soros.
On top of their national resources, Egypt also happens to be conveniently located right between Libya and Israel. And Israel wants to expand. Oh, and it's got a shitload of border on the Mediterranean, making it a valuable asset in other Middle-eastern affairs. Not to mention 1.1B annual industry in offshore outsourcing by companies like Microsoft (ICG is funded by Bill Gates foundation), Google, and HP...it would definitely benefit us to have friends in Egypt.
Iraq - Aaaaah...Iraq, the country we conveniently had plans to invade FOUR DAYS after 9/11. Funny how there has NEVER BEEN ANY EVIDENCE of ANY link to Al-Quaeda.
Not only that, but their claim that the Saddam had WMD's and mobile laboratories was based on a SINGLE VERBAL ACOUNT from an Iraqi Expatriate who himself said he was "utterly astonished" that the US believed him. Conveniently enough, Iraq also has a SHITLOAD OF OIL (about 10% of the World's proven reserves) that the US is now completely in control of, and protects with military bases and a .44 square kilometer "Embassy Complex" that is larger than Vatican City.
Oh, and did I mention that the original invasion of Kuwait took place by Saddam Hussein with the blessing of the US Ambassador to Iraq at the time? Or howabout the fact that in 1998, a one George Soros effected the drafting of an Open Letter to the Clinton Administration demanding military force to cause regime change in Iraq?
Ivory Coast - Ivory Coast is important because they have COCOA. As weird as it sounds, a large majority of the world's Cocoa comes from IC. As I've been saying, the pattern here is to swoop in with the IMF, privatize a countries resources, and make the folks suffer.
So, with all this other shit is going on, France and the UN decided to go into the former French Colony and depose it's RECOGNIZED ELECTED official. Why? Because the guy that has direct ties to the IMF and World Bank, the one "they" wanted in power there, was ruled invalid to be president of IC because he was not a natural citizen. This decision came from a non-corrupt Supreme Court in that country. However, the UN decided that wasn't cool, so they forcibly removed the rightful President.
Libya - Libya is easy. We've wanted Khaddafi out of power since the Regan administration (Back when dude was actually dangerous). It should be pointed out that many of the "rebels" in Libya are actually Al-Quaeda, and that there is a lot of hard evidence that shows that the US government trains and funds Al-Quaeda time and time again.
So, why now? Because...in 2009, Gaddafi announced that he was going to nationalize Libya's oil...and that of all Oil in the region. Not only that, he wanted to DISMANTLE THE GOVERNMENT, remove himself from power, and redistribute the wealth directly to the 5 million citizens of Libya.
This would be VERY bad for the people at Anglo-Dutch SHELL, BP, EXXONMOBIL, Hess Corp., MARATHON OIL, Occidental, ConocoPHILLIPS...etc. Why? Because...they no longer get to make all the money on Libyan oil...it all goes to the people.
On top of that, Libya's Central Bank is independant from the BIS...which means they have more bargaining power because they control their own central bank. It's complex, but it's a bad thing if you want to have global control over shit. Instead of the IMF being able to offer high-interest loans to Libyan citizens and entrap them in a cycle of perpetual debt, they would be free to offer interest-free loans to Libyan citizens.
So, what do you do? Funnel money into political parties and trained killers, have them get the locals all worked up, then go attack the president who is trying to defend himself. And look what happens! The rebels establish a national bank and set up new agreements to distribute oil. Surprised yet?
Afghanistan - Believe it or not...we are not in Afghanistan on a search for Osama Bin Laden. We are not there because the Taliban is our enemy, as some stupid country singer so proposed. Fuck...we put the Taliban in power in the first place.
Once again...we are in Afghanistan because of...OIL!
According to this well-researched article, we've wanted to install a "Western-friendly" government in Afghanistan since 1998...three years before 9/11. Numerous government documents outline the NEED for an OIL PIPELINE to be constructed through Afghanistan, and the challenges issued by the current seated government.
Then you have a lovely timeline showing that we were attacking them YEARS before 9/11, and that we had troops in place before we were ever "Attacked".
The pipeline itself? It would provide a link to Azerbaijan, which is oil-rich and US-friendly, across the Caspian Sea, through Turkey, through Afghanistan, through Pakistan, and finally to ships to be distributed around the world (To US). The only country in the region not on board was AFGHANISTAN. Furthermore, this explains why, despite the fact that we know the Pakistani government is funding Al-Qaeda and is most likely where Osama Bin Laden really is, we have not gone into Pakistan to get him. They're our "ally".
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/oil.html
All-CIA, DUH! - In the 1980's, the US helped to train and fund a band of Mujadeen fighters who called themselves Al-Qaeda. One of the leaders was a guy named Osama Bin Laden, and the program was called Operation Cyclone.
It has furthermore been asserted that the CIA continued to fund Bin Laden after the original events in Afghanistan.
Lastly, the man who reportedly #1 on the CIA's capture/kill list (issued by Bush J.), Al-Qaeda Leader Anwar Al-Awlaki, was having lunch at the Pentagon with top Military Officials months after 9/11.
And that's just skimming the surface. Then you look at the current friendly involvement with the same group in Libya, and it doesn't sound so damned crazy.
Basically...the US Military is not some great vehicle for freedom like people so obviously believe. Our soldiers are not fighting for our freedom, and 9/11 was not perpetrated by some dark-skinned assholes because they hates US freedom. It was orchestrated by our government and a group of super-rich elite as an effort to sell a war that had nothing to do with "freedom" and everything to do with stealing other countries resources for our own economic benefit.
Japan & HAARP - This next bit is mere speculation. I'm going to offer up a bunch of documented information, then explain a very logical motive, then leave it for you to decide. I don't fully believe this, but it wouldn't surprise me if it turned out to be true.
So, HAARP stands for High Auroral Activity Research Project. It is a government-owned facility in Alaska...
If you really want to know about HAARP, read the following link. It summarizes the book "Angels Don't Play this HAARP", which is another well-researched book on the whole shebang, and what it can do.http://haarp.net/
So, if you're still with me and you even skimmed that article, you maybe understand how it is possible to, say, cause an earthquake in Japan.
As to the motives...again, it's fairly simple. Destabilization. Japan is the third-largest economy in the world, behind the US and China. Not only that, but given Japan's strategic location in regards to China and North Korea, I would think that Japan would be a PERFECT place to want a reason to set up bases and distribute "humanitarian aid".
As I pointed out in the beginning of this writing, many people believe that the US is trying to cause similar destabilization in China. Considering as how we are in a deep economic recession and that China is quickly becoming poised to be the new world Superpower, it would seem logical that if you're the spoiled kid on the way out, you're going to do everything possible in order to keep your position in first. That "everything" would include destabilizing and controlling areas that are key to our Economic superiority (through oil and other natural resources).
In closing...I don't claim that 100% of this is right-on-the-money. I am just pointing out what I've seen as being pretty odd, and explaining that I feel that it seems like a lot more than just coincidence that all these countries with stuff we want are being destabilized at the same time. It seems like a desperate power-play, or maybe the first steps in trying to force the world into a one-world-government. Whatever the case...it's fucking scary...
Tuesday, March 15, 2011
Could Nuclear Radiation From A Meltdown Of The Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Reactors In Japan Reach The United States?
The possibility of a full-blown nuclear meltdown of one or more of the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear reactors seems to increase by the hour. Millions of weary Japanese citizens are desperately hoping that the worst case scenario does not play out. A major nuclear disaster is the last thing that they need at this point. So could radiation from a meltdown of one or more of the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear reactors reach the United States? Unfortunately, the answer is yes. Right now authorities in Japan are hoping to avert a full-blown meltdown and keep the radiation that is escaping to minimal levels, but at this point it appears that they are fighting a losing battle. Yesterday, yet another of the reactors exploded. The explosion at Fukushima Dai-ichi unit 2 was the third major explosion in four days. Previously there had also been huge explosions at unit 3 and at unit 1. Japanese authorities are feverishly trying to pump sea water into all of the reactors in the complex in an attempt to cool them down. At this point authorities in Japan have admitted that the levels of radiation in the areas immediately surrounding the reactors "can impact human health", and Japanese Prime Minister Naoto Kan is saying that the risk that further radioactive material will be released is "very high". Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano has told the media that fuel rods in three of the reactors appear to be melting and that he cannot rule out the possibility of a full-blown meltdown in all three of the problem reactors. Right now, the Japanese government is advising all people living within a 30 kilometer radius of the reactors to stay indoors.
As far as Japan is concerned, the worst case scenario is that multiple reactors could experience a meltdown and they could end up facing a situation of trying to deal with "many Chernobyls".
Tokyo has 13 million residents, and there is a very real possibility that during a full-blown meltdown the winds could shift and carry a massive radioactive cloud in that direction. That would be an unprecedented health disaster.
But could a full-blown meltdown at one or more of the reactors mean a health disaster for the United States as well?
During the Chernobyl disaster 25 years ago, radiation was spread literally throughout the entire northern hemisphere. If the worst case scenario happens in Japan, the prevailing westerly winds would likely transport radiation from Japan directly to the west coast of the United States.
Nuclear expert Joseph Cirincione recently told Fox News the following....
"The worst-case scenario is that the fuel rods fuse together - temperatures get so hot that [they] melt together into a radioactive molten mass that busts through the containment mechanisms. So they spew radioactivity into the ground, into the air, into the water. Some of that radioactivity could carry in the atmosphere to the west coast of the United States."
During a full-blown meltdown, radioactive material would be blasted high into our atmosphere. Once the material was high enough in the atmosphere, the jet stream would pick it up and transport it at high speeds across the Pacific Ocean.
The following video shows how the jet stream takes air currents from Japan straight over to the northwest United States. If radiation gets into the jet stream over Japan, the first major land mass that it is going to encounter is North America. Just check out the video below....
So how long would it take radiation from Japan to reach the United States?
Well, according to a report on Infowars.com, it wouldn't take long....
It would take roughly seven days for the radiation to reach Anchorage, eight days until it reached Honolulu, ten days for Seattle and eleven days before it hit Los Angeles, according to figures calculated by Expert Senior Global Meteorologist Jim Andrews.
What could potentially make things even worse is the kind of fuel being used in these reactors. Apparently mox (mixed oxide) fuel is more dangerous than the conventional fuel used is most nuclear reactors. According to the BBC, a Japanese engineer named Masashi Goto told a news conference in Tokyo the following....
Japanese engineer Masashi Goto, who helped design the containment vessel for Fukushima’s reactor core, says the design was not enough to withstand earthquakes or tsunamis and the plant’s builders, Toshiba, knew this.
Mr Goto says his greatest fear is that blasts at number 3 and number 1 reactors may have damaged the steel casing of the containment vessel designed to stop radioactive material escaping into the atmosphere.
He says that as the reactor uses mox (mixed oxide) fuel, the melting point is lower than that of conventional fuel. Should a meltdown and an explosion occur, he says, plutonium could be spread over an area up to twice as far as estimated for a conventional nuclear fuel explosion. The next 24 hours are critical, he says.
Why in the world did anyone think that it was a good idea to build nuclear reactors in Japan anyway? The truth is that Japan sits on or next to four different tectonic plates. It is one of the most tectonically active regions in the world. Anyone should have been able to foresee that any nuclear facility built near the coast in Japan would eventually be hit by a tsunami.
But unfortunately a whole bunch of nuclear reactors were built along the coast in Japan. And right now problems are starting to develop at facilities other than the Fukushima Dai-ichi reactors. Let us just hope that we don't see any more explosions.
This is a problem that is not going away any time soon. According to The New York Times, this is a crisis that could potentially last for months....
As the scale of Japan’s nuclear crisis begins to come to light, experts in Japan and the United States say the country is now facing a cascade of accumulating problems that suggest that radioactive releases of steam from the crippled plants could go on for weeks or even months.
So what should you do if you live along the west coast of the United States?
Well, you should keep a close eye on the news, that is for sure. Any signs that large amounts of radiation have been released in Japan should be taken very seriously.
Hopefully the folks in Japan know what they are doing and will be able to get this crisis under control.
But there is absolutely no guarantee that is going to happen.
If the worst case scenario comes to fruition, we could end up facing the worst nuclear disaster in history. That is not something to be taken lightly.
Let us just pray that this nightmare does not get any worse.
Original Posting here:
http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/could-nuclear-radiation-from-a-meltdown-of-the-fukushima-dai-ichi-nuclear-reactors-in-japan-reach-the-united-states
As far as Japan is concerned, the worst case scenario is that multiple reactors could experience a meltdown and they could end up facing a situation of trying to deal with "many Chernobyls".
Tokyo has 13 million residents, and there is a very real possibility that during a full-blown meltdown the winds could shift and carry a massive radioactive cloud in that direction. That would be an unprecedented health disaster.
But could a full-blown meltdown at one or more of the reactors mean a health disaster for the United States as well?
During the Chernobyl disaster 25 years ago, radiation was spread literally throughout the entire northern hemisphere. If the worst case scenario happens in Japan, the prevailing westerly winds would likely transport radiation from Japan directly to the west coast of the United States.
Nuclear expert Joseph Cirincione recently told Fox News the following....
"The worst-case scenario is that the fuel rods fuse together - temperatures get so hot that [they] melt together into a radioactive molten mass that busts through the containment mechanisms. So they spew radioactivity into the ground, into the air, into the water. Some of that radioactivity could carry in the atmosphere to the west coast of the United States."
During a full-blown meltdown, radioactive material would be blasted high into our atmosphere. Once the material was high enough in the atmosphere, the jet stream would pick it up and transport it at high speeds across the Pacific Ocean.
The following video shows how the jet stream takes air currents from Japan straight over to the northwest United States. If radiation gets into the jet stream over Japan, the first major land mass that it is going to encounter is North America. Just check out the video below....
So how long would it take radiation from Japan to reach the United States?
Well, according to a report on Infowars.com, it wouldn't take long....
It would take roughly seven days for the radiation to reach Anchorage, eight days until it reached Honolulu, ten days for Seattle and eleven days before it hit Los Angeles, according to figures calculated by Expert Senior Global Meteorologist Jim Andrews.
What could potentially make things even worse is the kind of fuel being used in these reactors. Apparently mox (mixed oxide) fuel is more dangerous than the conventional fuel used is most nuclear reactors. According to the BBC, a Japanese engineer named Masashi Goto told a news conference in Tokyo the following....
Japanese engineer Masashi Goto, who helped design the containment vessel for Fukushima’s reactor core, says the design was not enough to withstand earthquakes or tsunamis and the plant’s builders, Toshiba, knew this.
Mr Goto says his greatest fear is that blasts at number 3 and number 1 reactors may have damaged the steel casing of the containment vessel designed to stop radioactive material escaping into the atmosphere.
He says that as the reactor uses mox (mixed oxide) fuel, the melting point is lower than that of conventional fuel. Should a meltdown and an explosion occur, he says, plutonium could be spread over an area up to twice as far as estimated for a conventional nuclear fuel explosion. The next 24 hours are critical, he says.
Why in the world did anyone think that it was a good idea to build nuclear reactors in Japan anyway? The truth is that Japan sits on or next to four different tectonic plates. It is one of the most tectonically active regions in the world. Anyone should have been able to foresee that any nuclear facility built near the coast in Japan would eventually be hit by a tsunami.
But unfortunately a whole bunch of nuclear reactors were built along the coast in Japan. And right now problems are starting to develop at facilities other than the Fukushima Dai-ichi reactors. Let us just hope that we don't see any more explosions.
This is a problem that is not going away any time soon. According to The New York Times, this is a crisis that could potentially last for months....
As the scale of Japan’s nuclear crisis begins to come to light, experts in Japan and the United States say the country is now facing a cascade of accumulating problems that suggest that radioactive releases of steam from the crippled plants could go on for weeks or even months.
So what should you do if you live along the west coast of the United States?
Well, you should keep a close eye on the news, that is for sure. Any signs that large amounts of radiation have been released in Japan should be taken very seriously.
Hopefully the folks in Japan know what they are doing and will be able to get this crisis under control.
But there is absolutely no guarantee that is going to happen.
If the worst case scenario comes to fruition, we could end up facing the worst nuclear disaster in history. That is not something to be taken lightly.
Let us just pray that this nightmare does not get any worse.
Original Posting here:
http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/could-nuclear-radiation-from-a-meltdown-of-the-fukushima-dai-ichi-nuclear-reactors-in-japan-reach-the-united-states
Monday, February 7, 2011
Corruptable recording begins!
Tonight Corrupable will begin recording a studio album. Our goal of completion is mid July. We have a limited schedule for this duration. Thanks to all the fans. We love you, and promise to get you an album asap.
Charlie
Ben
Derek
Jonny
Charlie
Ben
Derek
Jonny
Thursday, January 27, 2011
Sunday, January 16, 2011 The Witch Hunt Begins: Citizen Spy Network Targets Political Speech and Gun Owners
Copied from prisonplanet.com
Bill Would Protect Big Sis’ Citizen Spies From Lawsuits
House Homeland Security Chairman Peter King wants to shield “good citizens who report suspicious activity” from the consequences of their actionsPaul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Thursday, January 27, 2011
New York Republican Peter King has introduced a bill that would protect the army of citizen spies Homeland Security hopes to recruit under Janet Napolitano’s “See Something, Say Something” snoop campaign from lawsuits brought by innocent people wrongly accused of being terrorists or extremists.
“A top US lawmaker unveiled legislation on Wednesday to protect individuals who tip off authorities to potential extremist threats from lawsuits, in the event that they turn out to finger innocents,” reports AFP.
House Homeland Security Chairman King, who is pushing the “See Something, Say Something Act,” wants to shield “good citizens who report suspicious activity” from facing the consequences of misidentifying innocent behavior as extremism or terror.
Of course, this will only encourage untrained people to report any behavior whatsoever, no matter how benign, as potential terrorism, creating an army of enthusiastic but hapless citizen spies.
“King said his bill would extend protections from individuals “who report suspicious activity anywhere,” adds the report, making reference to the DHS’ “See Something, Say Something” campaign, which characterizes paying for things with cash as a suspicious activity.
The program was launched with the aid of Orwellian telescreens at Wal-Mart checkouts that play a message from Homeland Security chief Janet Napolitano encouraging Americans to report anything unusual to Wal-Mart managers. The program was subsequently expanded to include 9,000 federal buildings, as well as sports stadiums, businesses and communities in general.
DHS will no longer be limited to the airport in the form of the TSA, but will become a ubiquitous entity policing everyone through a network of citizen spies and infrastructure security technology. The agency will also assume the mantle of regulating Americans’ every behavior and activity. DHS signs are already in place all over the country telling people where they can and can’t park their cars.
As we have documented, every historical example of such informant programs illustrates that they never lead to a more secure society, but instead breed suspicion, distrust, fear and resentment amongst the population. The only “benefit” that such programs have ever achieved is allowing the state to more easily identify and persecute political dissidents, while discouraging the wider population from engaging in any criticism against the government.
Since its official launch, the See Something, Say Something campaign has successfully wasted thousands of dollars of taxpayer money after people reported half-empty flasks of coffee and bags of clothes as deadly threats that required a response from bomb squads.
Of course, as we have documented, the federal government is fully aware of the fact that Americans are just as likely to be killed by lightning strikes, peanut allergies or accident-causing deer than they are by terrorists.
See Something, Say Something has little to do with combating terrorism, and everything to do with implanting the notion that Americans are constantly under surveillance from each other and may be reported to the authorities for any minor example of aberrant behavior no matter how benign.
In addition, since the Department of Homeland Security has characterized political activism which targets the state as extremist and terrorist activity, Americans are being trained that exercising their constitutional rights could get them in hot water with the law should their behavior be deemed suspicious by ignorant wannabe citizen spies who see themselves as terrorist hunters.
In an ironic twist, Rep. King, who is now trying to protect snoops who identify innocent behavior as extremism from lawsuits, was one of the primary co-sponsors of a 2009 House resolution that attempted to get answers as to why Homeland Security equated veterans, gun owners, Ron Paul supporters, and people who fly the U.S. flag, with violent terrorists, following the release of the agency’s infamous MIAC report.
Monday, January 24, 2011
No, we didn't break up...
Hey there.
As some of you may know, at one point in time we had another show scheduled at Linneman's on February 5th. However, due to a scheduling conflict, we were asked to reschedule to the following weekend. To this, we respectfully declined.
We decided, instead, to hunker down and create a real, whole, actual album featuring Corruptable with it's current lineup. We have purchased new recording equipment, and are just a few weeks out from sitting down and making some magic.
With that said...you probably won't be seeing us out much for a few months. We plan on releasing 14 (possibly 15) songs, so obviously, this is where we're going to be focusing our energy.
Keep your eyes here for more details...
As some of you may know, at one point in time we had another show scheduled at Linneman's on February 5th. However, due to a scheduling conflict, we were asked to reschedule to the following weekend. To this, we respectfully declined.
We decided, instead, to hunker down and create a real, whole, actual album featuring Corruptable with it's current lineup. We have purchased new recording equipment, and are just a few weeks out from sitting down and making some magic.
With that said...you probably won't be seeing us out much for a few months. We plan on releasing 14 (possibly 15) songs, so obviously, this is where we're going to be focusing our energy.
Keep your eyes here for more details...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)